Navigate India's diverse landscape with IndiDNA

admin@indidna.com

USA Finance Digest is your one-stop destination for the latest financial news and insights

Navigate India's diverse landscape with IndiDNA
Popular

“I Was At War”: Shakib Al Hasan’s Explosive Reaction to Angelo Mathews’ ‘Timed Out’ Dismissal in the Cricket World Cup

For the next few days, one term that will be spoken about a lot is ‘timed out’. Angelo Mathews and Shakib Al Hasan got a permanent place in the cricket history as the duo was involved in one of the rarest dismissals in cricket, that too in a Cricket World Cup match. Former Sri Lanka captain Angelo Mathews was given ‘timed out’ – for the first time in the history of international cricket – with rival captain Shakib Al Hasan appealing for it. The decision left the cricket world divided.

Shakib was within the rules to appeal for the timed out decision. Shakib Al Hasan played a big part, scoring 82, as Sri Lanka failed to defend a 279-run target against Bangladesh.

“One of our fielders came to me and said that if I appealed, he would be out. The umpire asked me if I was serious. It’s in the laws; I don’t know if it’s right or wrong. I felt like I was at war. Whatever I had to do, I did it. There will be debates. Today that (the time out) helped, I won’t deny that!” Shakib Al Hasan said after the match.

“When I won the toss, I didn’t have any hesitation in bowling first because we had trained here [in the dew]. We had to bat deep. Luckily we got a big partnership. Shanto and I applied ourselves really well. We would have loved to finish early – with lesser wickets [lost] – but a win is a win.”

Charith Asalanka’s century went in vain as Bangladesh defeated Sri Lanka by three wickets in an inconsequential match of the World Cup in Delhi on Monday.

Sent in to bat, middle-order batter Asalanka scored a 105-ball 108, while opener Pathum Nissanka and Sadeera Samarawickrama made identical scores of 41 runs each to help Sri Lanka post 279 all out in 49.3 overs in a contest between teams which are out of semifinal contention.

Bangladesh scored the required runs in 41.1 overs for the loss of seven wickets.

The Sri Lankan innings was marred by an incident where Angelo Mathews became the first international cricketer to be ‘timed out’ after not being ready to face the ball within two minutes of the fall of a wicket.

The 36-year-old walked out to bat after the dismissal of Samarawickrama but had some issues with his helmet strap and signalled for a replacement, prompting Bangladesh to appeal for a ‘time out’.

Mathews was seen having a animated discussion with the umpires but the Sri Lankan was asked to leave the field.

Later, Najmul Hossain Shanto (90) and skipper Shakib Al Hasan (82) shared 161 runs for the third wicket to lay the foundation for the win, reaching 282 for 7 in 41.1 overs.

Dilshan Madushanka (3/69) was the pick of the bowlers for Sri Lanka, while Angelo Mathews (2/35) returned with two wickets, including the scalp of Shakib.

with PTI inputs

Topics mentioned in this article

Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

UN Chief Warns of Gaza Turning Into “Graveyard For Children”

Next Post

Punjab Government Offers Pre-GST Dues Settlement as Diwali Gift to Traders

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read next
Archaeologists have stated the settlement web site dates again to five,700 years in the past Ahmedabad: A…
Harshkumar Patel or “Soiled Harry” was arrested from Chicago airport. New Delhi: US authorities have…

He Is Innocent Nirav Modi Declares Innocence to UK Court [ad_1] <!– –>Nirav Modi was arrested on March 19, 2019, on an extradition warrant (File)London: Nirav Modi, the fugitive diamond merchant wanted in India to stand trial on fraud and money laundering charges, told a UK court on Thursday that he could be in England for years as some ongoing proceedings prevent his extradition.The 52-year-old former billionaire appeared for a hearing at Barkingside Magistrates’ Court in east London via video link from Thameside prison in relation legal costs, or fines, amounting to GBP 150,247.00, accrued over his failed extradition appeal proceedings in the London High Court.Dressed in a pink prison-issue outfit and sporting a moustache, a plump and bald Nirav Modi addressed the three-member magistrates’ bench to reveal that he had complied with the previous court direction to pay in GBP 10,000 per month towards the fines.”I am in prison on remand and remain un-convicted. I am here because of an extradition request from the Indian government,” Nirav Modi told the court, when asked for the reason behind his continued imprisonment.Questioned if he was aware of a timeframe for the extradition proceedings to be completed, he responded “unfortunately not”.”To clarify, I was arrested in mid-March for extradition. Some proceedings are still going on which stop my extradition to India… It is very likely I will be in England for a long time, could be three months, six months, could be years,” he said, as the court deliberated upon the length of adjournment.Taking note of the uncertainty, the case related to the unpaid fines was adjourned to February 8, 2024, when Nirav Modi would again be expected to appear via video link from prison.Meanwhile, the outstanding fines balance was confirmed as GBP 70,247, which the diamantaire said he intends to carry on paying towards to “reduce the balance” so as “not to be in contempt of court”.At an earlier hearing listed for the same court in September it emerged that Nirav Modi had been transferred out of HMP (His Majesty’s Prison) Wandsworth, one of the UK’s largest and most overcrowded prisons, to the privately-run HMP Thameside in south-east London.The news of the transfer came days after a major manhunt was launched after a terrorist suspect escaped Wandsworth prison in south-west London. The escape had raised serious questions around alleged understaffing and overcrowding at Wandsworth, where Nirav Modi had been lodged since his arrest on an extradition warrant in March 2019.Last year, Nirav Modi lost his legal battle in the highest UK court against being extradited to India in the estimated USD 2 billion Punjab National Bank (PNB) loan scam case. But his case is now said to be “statute barred”, indicating further pending litigation which could be linked to a confidential asylum application.At the last procedural hearing in March this year, Barkingside Magistrates’ Court had granted his plea to be allowed to pay GBP 10,000 a month using borrowed funds after he told the court of his financial hardships due to his assets being frozen in India. This week’s hearing was scheduled as a review of that previous order.In December last year, a two-judge bench in the Royal Courts of Justice in London had refused Nirav Modi’s application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court on suicide risk grounds and also refused his application to certify a point of law, which concluded his extradition appeal options in the UK courts.Nirav Modi was arrested on March 19, 2019, on an extradition warrant based on Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate (ED) charges against the businessman.There are three sets of criminal proceedings against the diamantaire in India – the CBI case of fraud on the PNB which caused losses equivalent to over GBP 700 million, the ED case relating to the alleged laundering of the proceeds of that fraud and a third set of criminal proceedings involving alleged interference with evidence and witnesses in the CBI proceedings.Then UK Home Secretary, Priti Patel, had ordered Nirav Modi’s extradition based on Judge Sam Goozee’s Westminster Magistrates’ Court ruling in April 2021. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)Waiting for response to load… [ad_2]

Incident came about in Mejapur village, police stated. (Representational) Sitapur: Aggrieved over his mom for…